🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.